[SA-exim] Header Problem.

[Marc MERLIN]

On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 11:05:29PM +0000, Tim Jackson wrote:
> I understand you not wanting to add "option cruft", although I don't think
> 1 additional option would hurt it. I dunno. I don't have any hugely strong
> feelings either way - I don't think it would be out of place there. Whilst
> Exim's options to remove headers are great, it seems natural to have an
> option at the point of injection. At the end of the day, most people can
> just leave it alone, or just set it to 1 or 0; it shouldn't really
> complicate things.
 
Fair enough.
 
> Anyway, I want to say again just how successful SA-E is.  After using it
> on my server for a while (which to be honest doesn't handle very much
> mail), I've put it on our server at work which is still lightly loaded
> (there's only a few of us :) but in the first 3 weeks it caught ~1700
> spams, with 0 false positives (SApermreject=13.0). At last, I can actually
> use my mailboxes again. Fantastic!

Most of the credit goes to SpamAssassin :-)

Marc
-- 
"A mouse is a device used to point at the xterm you want to type in" - A.S.R.
Microsoft is to operating systems & security ....
                                      .... what McDonalds is to gourmet cooking 
Home page: http://marc.merlins.org/   |   Finger marc_f@merlins.org for PGP key