[SA-exim] sa-exim before mailman

[Justin F. Knotzke]

<quote who=Justin F. Knotzke date=[030807 21:07]/>
> 
>    Hi,
> 
>    Is there a way for sa-exim to kick in before exim4 sends mail
> destined for mailman?
> 
>    Right now exim4 appears to be sending mail directly to mailman before
> allowing sa-exim to do its job.

   Actually, that's not entirely true. The message was passed through
sa-exim:

2003-08-07 19:58:06 19kudx-0001gL-Qx SA: Debug: SAEximRunCond expand returned: '1'
2003-08-07 19:58:06 19kudx-0001gL-Qx SA: Debug: check succeeded, running spamc
2003-08-07 19:58:09 19kudx-0001gL-Qx SA: Debug: SAEximRejCond expand returned: '1'
2003-08-07 19:58:09 19kudx-0001gL-Qx SA: Debug: Writing message to /var/spool/exim/SAspama
ccept/new/1060300689_3043892.1060300610106.JavaMail.ahmedsanusi at gomailjtp05
2003-08-07 19:58:09 19kudx-0001gL-Qx SA: Action: flagged as Spam but accepted: Score hits=
9.0 required=4.3 (scanned in 3/3 secs)
2003-08-07 19:58:09 19kudx-0001gL-Qx <= mail at shampoo.ca H=mta07f.seamail.go.com [199.181.1
34.24] P=esmtp S=4558 id=3043892.1060300610106.JavaMail.ahmedsanusi at gomailjtp05
2003-08-07 19:58:10 19kudx-0001gL-Qx => vcom <vcom at shampoo.ca>
R=mailman_router T=mailman_ transport
2003-08-07 19:58:10 19kudx-0001gL-Qx Completed

    Maybe someone could explain to me why the message was sent to
SAspamaccept and then to mailman instead of rejected. This message was
clearly marked as spam by spamassassin with a score of 9/4.3

   Thanks

   J


-- 
Justin F. Knotzke
jknotzke at shampoo.ca
http://www.shampoo.ca