[SA-exim] spamc -U /foo/bar

[Richard Salts]

I was wondering if it is possible to have sa-exim pass arguments to spamc. I
have spamd running on a Unix socket so wanted to run spamc -U /foo/bar so I 
changed SAspamcpath to that. However I get this as a result:

2003-12-02 19:21:20 1AR5mR-0003nE-7g SA: Debug: SAEximRunCond expand returned: '
1'
2003-12-02 19:21:20 1AR5mR-0003nE-7g SA: Debug: check succeeded, running spamc
2003-12-02 19:21:20 1AR5mR-0003nE-7g SA: PANIC: Unexpected error on exec /usr/bi
n/spamc -U /tmp/spamd (but message was accepted), file sa-exim.c, line 848: No s
uch file or directory
2003-12-02 19:21:20 1AR5mR-0003nE-7g SA: Debug: Writing message to /var/spool/sa
-exim/SAerrorsave/new/1070353280_1AR5mR-0003nE-7g
2003-12-02 19:21:20 1AR5mR-0003nE-7g SA: Notice: creating maildir tree in  /var/
spool/sa-exim/SAerrorsave
2003-12-02 19:21:20 1AR5mR-0003nE-7g SA: PANIC: Error in error handler while try
ing to save mail to /var/spool/sa-exim/SAerrorsave/1070353280_1AR5mR-0003nE-7g,
file sa-exim.c, line 1345: Illegal seek
2003-12-02 19:21:21 1AR5mR-0003nE-7g <= test at thats.prettyfar.com H=nitrous (foo)
 [192.168.0.64] P=esmtp S=369
2003-12-02 19:21:21 1AR5mR-0003nE-7g Spool file is locked (another process is ha
ndling this message)
2003-12-02 19:21:21 1AR5mR-0003nE-7g SA: PANIC: wait on spamc child yielded, 256
 (but message was accepted)
2003-12-02 19:21:21 1AR5mR-0003nE-7g SA: Debug: Writing message to /var/spool/sa
-exim/SAerrorsave/new/1070353280_1AR5mR-0003nE-7g
2003-12-02 19:21:21 1AR5mR-0003nE-7g <= test at thats.prettyfar.com H=nitrous (foo)
 [192.168.0.64] P=esmtp S=400

Yet it works fine when using spamc with no arguments.