[SA-exim] Spamassassin: perl vs. spamc/d benchmarks

Mark Boyd mboyd at cirilium.com
Tue Jan 28 19:35:12 2003


I believe the web site shows some stats.  If remember correctly for
small e-mails it's a 5x improvement to use spamd/spamc but for larger
ones only a 2x improvement.

Check out the web site there's more information there:

http://marc.merlins.org/linux/exim/sa.html

- Mark

-----Original Message-----
From: Max Clark [mailto:max@clarksys.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 11:42 AM
To: sa-exim@lists.merlins.org
Subject: [SA-exim] Spamassassin: perl vs. spamc/d benchmarks

Hi all!

Does anyone know of any benchmarks between the command line perl and the

spamc/d implementations of spamassassin?

Do I lose any major features using spamc/d?

Thanks in advance,
Max



_______________________________________________
SA-Exim mailing list
SA-Exim@lists.merlins.org
http://lists.merlins.org/lists/listinfo/sa-exim



More information about the SA-Exim mailing list