[SA-exim] Spamassassin: perl vs. spamc/d benchmarks
Mark Boyd
mboyd at cirilium.com
Tue Jan 28 19:35:12 2003
I believe the web site shows some stats. If remember correctly for
small e-mails it's a 5x improvement to use spamd/spamc but for larger
ones only a 2x improvement.
Check out the web site there's more information there:
http://marc.merlins.org/linux/exim/sa.html
- Mark
-----Original Message-----
From: Max Clark [mailto:max@clarksys.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 11:42 AM
To: sa-exim@lists.merlins.org
Subject: [SA-exim] Spamassassin: perl vs. spamc/d benchmarks
Hi all!
Does anyone know of any benchmarks between the command line perl and the
spamc/d implementations of spamassassin?
Do I lose any major features using spamc/d?
Thanks in advance,
Max
_______________________________________________
SA-Exim mailing list
SA-Exim@lists.merlins.org
http://lists.merlins.org/lists/listinfo/sa-exim
More information about the SA-Exim
mailing list