[SA-exim] devnull relayed spam?

[Marc MERLIN]

On Thu, Nov 04, 2004 at 01:59:46PM +0100, Kilian Krause wrote:
> Hi Marc,
> 
> > But let me ask, teergrubbing a peer MX is bad, but why are you trying to
> > /dev/null? Can't you just reject the mail?
> 
> sure it's bad. And bouncing would mean to introduce secondary spam as
> most of the sender addresses are very likely to be either fake or void.
> Thus i'd just like to accept them and stuff them into the digital
> dustbin for the sake of other postmasters out there.
 
I see. I have just less compassion that you :)
(if they accept random spam they're going to get the unbounceable mail
anyway, with or without me refusing some of their forwards)

So, if each option were conditional instead of just having a score, that
would do what you need.
This is already a feature request, and I'm hoping to put that in the next
version

Marc
-- 
"A mouse is a device used to point at the xterm you want to type in" - A.S.R.
Microsoft is to operating systems & security ....
                                      .... what McDonalds is to gourmet cooking
Home page: http://marc.merlins.org/   |   Finger marc_f at merlins.org for PGP key
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 307 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.merlins.org/archives/sa-exim/attachments/20041104/5c43793f/attachment.bin