From marc at merlins.org Tue Jan 11 06:40:33 2005 From: marc at merlins.org (Marc MERLIN) Date: Tue Jan 11 06:40:34 2005 Subject: [SA-exim] SA-Exim 4.1 prerelease: SA 3.0 and conditional scores support Message-ID: <20050111144033.GB22084@merlins.org> Ok, so the movies on the plane on my way back from France sucked, so I read my mail and coded some :) The several times requested feature to have SA threshold scores be exim conditions, is now reality So, instead of the old SAteergrube: 25.0 SAteergrubecond: ${if and { {!eq {$sender_host_address}{204.80.101.251}} {!eq {$sender_host_address}{12.152.184.149}} {!eq {$sender_host_address}{194.2.204.37}} {!eq {$sender_host_address}{216.239.45.4}} {!eq {$sender_host_address}{216.109.84.130}} } {1}{0}} You now have: SAteergrube: ${if and { {!eq {$sender_host_address}{204.80.101.251}} {!eq {$sender_host_address}{12.152.184.149}} {!eq {$sender_host_address}{194.2.204.37}} {!eq {$sender_host_address}{216.239.45.4}} {!eq {$sender_host_address}{216.109.84.130}} } {25.0}{1048576}} This also applies to the other scores (devnull, permreject, tempreject) You can try it out if you'd like: http://marc.merlins.org/linux/exim/files/sa-exim-cvs.tar.gz This also means 4.1 should come out some time soon, but I know better than to promise a date now :) (besides, I missed a lot of snow in Lake Tahoe while I was gone, and I intend to catch up ;) Marc -- "A mouse is a device used to point at the xterm you want to type in" - A.S.R. Microsoft is to operating systems & security .... .... what McDonalds is to gourmet cooking Home page: http://marc.merlins.org/ | Finger marc_f@merlins.org for PGP key From jvanasco at mastersofbranding.com Tue Jan 11 11:27:04 2005 From: jvanasco at mastersofbranding.com (Jonathan Vanasco) Date: Tue Jan 11 08:27:06 2005 Subject: [SA-exim] Wishlist requests In-Reply-To: <20050111144033.GB22084@merlins.org> References: <20050111144033.GB22084@merlins.org> Message-ID: Three requests: [ ] Ability to specify the user:group that sa-exim writes files as (for the timeout/accept/error archiving) -- and not just as the exim user (exim allows this option in transports) [ ] Ability to specify the permissions that sa-exim writes files as (for the timeout/accept/error archiving) -- and not just as 600 (exim allows this option in transports) [ ] Numbering scheme to be in sync with exim somehow Yeah, i know this is crazy. But sa-exim 4.1 will be out when exim 4.43 is out. would it be too crazy to use a scheme like exiscan acl uses ( so it would be sa-exim4.43-4.1 or sa-exim4.43.1 ). recently upgrading exim, i thought sa-exim wouldn't work anymore as the numbers were way lower. From marc at merlins.org Tue Jan 11 09:01:40 2005 From: marc at merlins.org (Marc MERLIN) Date: Tue Jan 11 09:01:41 2005 Subject: [SA-exim] Wishlist requests In-Reply-To: References: <20050111144033.GB22084@merlins.org> Message-ID: <20050111170140.GB5884@merlins.org> On Tue, Jan 11, 2005 at 11:27:04AM -0500, Jonathan Vanasco wrote: > > Three requests: > > [ ] Ability to specify the user:group that sa-exim writes files as (for > the timeout/accept/error archiving) -- and not just as the exim user > (exim allows this option in transports) I don't think it's likely to happen, a plugin doesn't have the ability. It gets the uid/gid that exim gives it. There might be an exim option, or you might convince Philip to make one. > [ ] Ability to specify the permissions that sa-exim writes files as > (for the timeout/accept/error archiving) -- and not just as 600 (exim > allows this option in transports) Mmmh, I could add that, but: - directories are made 770, and you can change them to anything you want after that from the command line - files are supposed to be created as 660 writefd=creat(string_sprintf("%s/new/%s", dir, filename), S_IRUSR|S_IWUSR|S_IRGRP|S_IWGRP); but they seem to be 600 on my system. Mmmmh.... There, you could influence the group of those files by making the parent directory 2770 That said, since the parent is protected, I could just make the files 0444 and people would rely on group permissions. > [ ] Numbering scheme to be in sync with exim somehow > Yeah, i know this is crazy. But sa-exim 4.1 will be out when exim > 4.43 is out. would it be too crazy to use a scheme like exiscan acl > uses ( so it would be sa-exim4.43-4.1 or sa-exim4.43.1 ). recently > upgrading exim, i thought sa-exim wouldn't work anymore as the numbers > were way lower. No :) SA-Exim is a plugin that uses the local_scan API. It should not depend or rely on a specific exim version (except for the minimum requirement). I upgrade exim all the time without upgrading sa-exim, and the other way around. exiscan was different because it was an exim patch which depended on the version of exim. Marc -- "A mouse is a device used to point at the xterm you want to type in" - A.S.R. Microsoft is to operating systems & security .... .... what McDonalds is to gourmet cooking Home page: http://marc.merlins.org/ | Finger marc_f@merlins.org for PGP key From Nigel.Metheringham at dev.intechnology.co.uk Tue Jan 11 17:13:00 2005 From: Nigel.Metheringham at dev.intechnology.co.uk (Nigel Metheringham) Date: Tue Jan 11 09:13:23 2005 Subject: [SA-exim] Wishlist requests In-Reply-To: <20050111170140.GB5884@merlins.org> References: <20050111144033.GB22084@merlins.org> <20050111170140.GB5884@merlins.org> Message-ID: <1105463580.12871.38.camel@angua.localnet> On Tue, 2005-01-11 at 09:01 -0800, Marc MERLIN wrote: > On Tue, Jan 11, 2005 at 11:27:04AM -0500, Jonathan Vanasco wrote: > > [ ] Ability to specify the user:group that sa-exim writes files as (for > > the timeout/accept/error archiving) -- and not just as the exim user > > (exim allows this option in transports) > > I don't think it's likely to happen, a plugin doesn't have the ability. > It gets the uid/gid that exim gives it. > There might be an exim option, or you might convince Philip to make one. This can't be done. Exim is running unprivileged at this point, so cannot change its user credentials. [Or rather, to do so means running exim as root for message receipt - this just isn't going to happen]. Nigel. > > > [ ] Ability to specify the permissions that sa-exim writes files as > > (for the timeout/accept/error archiving) -- and not just as 600 (exim > > allows this option in transports) > > Mmmh, I could add that, but: > - directories are made 770, and you can change them to anything you want > after that from the command line > - files are supposed to be created as 660 > writefd=creat(string_sprintf("%s/new/%s", dir, filename), S_IRUSR|S_IWUSR|S_IRGRP|S_IWGRP); > but they seem to be 600 on my system. Mmmmh.... > There, you could influence the group of those files by making the parent > directory 2770 > That said, since the parent is protected, I could just make the files 0444 > and people would rely on group permissions. > > > [ ] Numbering scheme to be in sync with exim somehow > > Yeah, i know this is crazy. But sa-exim 4.1 will be out when exim > > 4.43 is out. would it be too crazy to use a scheme like exiscan acl > > uses ( so it would be sa-exim4.43-4.1 or sa-exim4.43.1 ). recently > > upgrading exim, i thought sa-exim wouldn't work anymore as the numbers > > were way lower. > > No :) > SA-Exim is a plugin that uses the local_scan API. It should not depend or > rely on a specific exim version (except for the minimum requirement). > I upgrade exim all the time without upgrading sa-exim, and the other way > around. > > exiscan was different because it was an exim patch which depended on the > version of exim. > > Marc -- [ Nigel Metheringham Nigel.Metheringham@InTechnology.co.uk ] [ - Comments in this message are my own and not ITO opinion/policy - ] From marc at merlins.org Sat Jan 15 21:01:48 2005 From: marc at merlins.org (Marc MERLIN) Date: Sat Jan 15 21:01:49 2005 Subject: [SA-exim] SA-Exim 4.1 prerelease: SA 3.0 and conditional scores support In-Reply-To: <20050111144033.GB22084@merlins.org> References: <20050111144033.GB22084@merlins.org> Message-ID: <20050116050148.GK22577@merlins.org> On Tue, Jan 11, 2005 at 06:40:33AM -0800, Marc MERLIN wrote: > The several times requested feature to have SA threshold scores be exim > conditions, is now reality > > So, instead of the old > SAteergrube: 25.0 > SAteergrubecond: ${if and { {!eq {$sender_host_address}{204.80.101.251}} {!eq {$sender_host_address}{12.152.184.149}} {!eq {$sender_host_address}{194.2.204.37}} {!eq {$sender_host_address}{216.239.45.4}} {!eq {$sender_host_address}{216.109.84.130}} } {1}{0}} > > You now have: > SAteergrube: ${if and { {!eq {$sender_host_address}{204.80.101.251}} {!eq {$sender_host_address}{12.152.184.149}} {!eq {$sender_host_address}{194.2.204.37}} {!eq {$sender_host_address}{216.239.45.4}} {!eq {$sender_host_address}{216.109.84.130}} } {25.0}{1048576}} > > This also applies to the other scores (devnull, permreject, tempreject) > > You can try it out if you'd like: > http://marc.merlins.org/linux/exim/files/sa-exim-cvs.tar.gz Can some of the people who asked for this confirm that it works for them? I don't have much of a use for it myself, so I haven't tested it much. Thanks Marc -- "A mouse is a device used to point at the xterm you want to type in" - A.S.R. Microsoft is to operating systems & security .... .... what McDonalds is to gourmet cooking Home page: http://marc.merlins.org/ | Finger marc_f@merlins.org for PGP key From MCG at mpsistemas.es Mon Jan 17 17:07:19 2005 From: MCG at mpsistemas.es (MANUEL CANSECO GARCIA) Date: Mon Jan 17 08:07:41 2005 Subject: [SA-exim] Spam not checked Message-ID: 2005-01-06 13:19:23 1CmWbf-0003sn-8I SA: Debug: SAEximRunCond expand returned: '1' 2005-01-06 13:19:23 1CmWbf-0003sn-8I SA: Debug: check succeeded, running spamc 2005-01-06 13:19:26 1CmWbf-0003sn-8I SA: Action: SA didn't successfully run against message, accepting (time: 3/3 secs | Message-Id: 1CmWbf-0003sn-8I). Any ideas? Thx From marc at merlins.org Mon Jan 17 08:13:13 2005 From: marc at merlins.org (Marc MERLIN) Date: Mon Jan 17 08:13:15 2005 Subject: [SA-exim] Spam not checked In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20050117161313.GG20886@merlins.org> On Mon, Jan 17, 2005 at 05:07:19PM +0100, MANUEL CANSECO GARCIA wrote: > 2005-01-06 13:19:23 1CmWbf-0003sn-8I SA: Debug: SAEximRunCond expand returned: '1' > 2005-01-06 13:19:23 1CmWbf-0003sn-8I SA: Debug: check succeeded, running spamc > 2005-01-06 13:19:26 1CmWbf-0003sn-8I SA: Action: SA didn't successfully run against message, accepting (time: 3/3 secs | Message-Id: 1CmWbf-0003sn-8I). > > Any ideas? Thx The code looks for X-Spam-Status in the headers after running the message through SA. For whatever reason, those weren't added after SA ran. Check what you get when you run SA by hand against the same message Marc -- "A mouse is a device used to point at the xterm you want to type in" - A.S.R. Microsoft is to operating systems & security .... .... what McDonalds is to gourmet cooking Home page: http://marc.merlins.org/ | Finger marc_f@merlins.org for PGP key From marc at merlins.org Mon Jan 17 09:51:07 2005 From: marc at merlins.org (Marc MERLIN) Date: Mon Jan 17 09:51:09 2005 Subject: [SA-exim] SA-Exim 4.2 released (official SA 3.x support) Message-ID: <20050117175107.GI20886@merlins.org> I didn't get any reports on the pre-release, therefore it must be bug free and ready for release :) http://marc.merlins.org/linux/exim/sa.html http://sourceforge.net/projects/sa-exim/ (well, sf.net will be whenever they fix their out of space problem on the upload server) Deb package is here: http://marc.merlins.org/linux/exim/files/debian/ (compiled against unstable, you might have to rebuild for testing, or wait for official deb packages from Sander Smeenk) The changelist is here: * Fixed code so that it compiles inside the exim tree too (thanks Jason) * Support SA 3.0 new score reporting format (score= instead of hits=) * Proper SA 3.0 plugin support * Documentation updates * greylisting files now also save the last SA score, just in case * Saved files are now group read/write too, if you need to shut off group access, do it at the directory level * Only rewrite Content-Type/Content-Transfer-Encoding if SARewriteBody is on now (this used to be useful with old SA versions and defang_mime but those options are gone). Suggested by Adam Tilghman. * Finally made all score threshold variables exim conditions that are evaluated at runtime * SAteergrubecond is deprecated as a result Enjoy, Marc -- "A mouse is a device used to point at the xterm you want to type in" - A.S.R. Microsoft is to operating systems & security .... .... what McDonalds is to gourmet cooking Home page: http://marc.merlins.org/ | Finger marc_f@merlins.org for PGP key From jvanasco at mastersofbranding.com Mon Jan 17 13:46:47 2005 From: jvanasco at mastersofbranding.com (Jonathan Vanasco) Date: Mon Jan 17 10:46:46 2005 Subject: [SA-exim] Spam not checked In-Reply-To: <20050117161313.GG20886@merlins.org> References: <20050117161313.GG20886@merlins.org> Message-ID: <24039402-68B8-11D9-A6DC-000393863D5E@mastersofbranding.com> On Mon, Jan 17, 2005 at 05:07:19PM +0100, MANUEL CANSECO GARCIA wrote: >> 2005-01-06 13:19:23 1CmWbf-0003sn-8I SA: Debug: SAEximRunCond expand >> returned: '1' >> 2005-01-06 13:19:23 1CmWbf-0003sn-8I SA: Debug: check succeeded, >> running spamc >> 2005-01-06 13:19:26 1CmWbf-0003sn-8I SA: Action: SA didn't >> successfully run against message, accepting (time: 3/3 secs | >> Message-Id: 1CmWbf-0003sn-8I). >> try $ ps aux | grep spam I was getting that message a lot when spamd/spamc crashed. I don't know how or why it would crash, but every so often for 2 days straight spamd would just silently die -- and i'd never have known if 3hours worth of heavy spam came through. From MCG at mpsistemas.es Tue Jan 18 10:05:07 2005 From: MCG at mpsistemas.es (MANUEL CANSECO GARCIA) Date: Tue Jan 18 01:05:53 2005 Subject: [SA-exim] Spam not checked Message-ID: Hi, on sa-exim.conf SAspamcHost is 127.0.0.1 and the port is 783 this correct? I'm instaled sa-exim from apt-get and autoconfigure exim4. :S >>> Marc MERLIN 17/01/2005 >>> On Mon, Jan 17, 2005 at 05:07:19PM +0100, MANUEL CANSECO GARCIA wrote: > 2005-01-06 13:19:23 1CmWbf-0003sn-8I SA: Debug: SAEximRunCond expand returned: '1' > 2005-01-06 13:19:23 1CmWbf-0003sn-8I SA: Debug: check succeeded, running spamc > 2005-01-06 13:19:26 1CmWbf-0003sn-8I SA: Action: SA didn't successfully run against message, accepting (time: 3/3 secs | Message-Id: 1CmWbf-0003sn-8I). > > Any ideas? Thx The code looks for X-Spam-Status in the headers after running the message through SA. For whatever reason, those weren't added after SA ran. Check what you get when you run SA by hand against the same message Marc -- "A mouse is a device used to point at the xterm you want to type in" - A.S.R. Microsoft is to operating systems & security .... .... what McDonalds is to gourmet cooking Home page: http://marc.merlins.org/ | Finger marc_f@merlins.org for PGP key From mcg at mpsistemas.es Tue Jan 18 14:02:31 2005 From: mcg at mpsistemas.es (MANUEL CANSECO GARCIA) Date: Tue Jan 18 05:03:15 2005 Subject: [SA-exim] Subject rewrite Message-ID: Hi, this possible rewrite subject line and fordward spam identified mail to mailbox? Thx From marc at merlins.org Tue Jan 18 07:18:13 2005 From: marc at merlins.org (Marc MERLIN) Date: Tue Jan 18 07:18:19 2005 Subject: [SA-exim] Spam not checked In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20050118151813.GA10066@merlins.org> On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 10:05:07AM +0100, MANUEL CANSECO GARCIA wrote: > > The code looks for X-Spam-Status in the headers after running the message > > through SA. For whatever reason, those weren't added after SA ran. > > > > Check what you get when you run SA by hand against the same message > > on sa-exim.conf SAspamcHost is 127.0.0.1 and the port is 783 this correct? Most likely, but this is not what we recommended that you try/debug > I'm instaled sa-exim from apt-get and autoconfigure exim4. :S I'm starting to think that you may need to spend a little time learning how all those pieces work independently first On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 02:02:31PM +0100, MANUEL CANSECO GARCIA wrote: > Hi, > this possible rewrite subject line and fordward spam identified mail to mailbox? Thx SA, system_filter and/or procmail, see my comment above Marc -- "A mouse is a device used to point at the xterm you want to type in" - A.S.R. Microsoft is to operating systems & security .... .... what McDonalds is to gourmet cooking Home page: http://marc.merlins.org/ | Finger marc_f@merlins.org for PGP key From patrick at wudika.de Thu Jan 20 02:51:27 2005 From: patrick at wudika.de (Patrick von der Hagen) Date: Wed Jan 19 17:51:39 2005 Subject: [SA-exim] problems building sa-exim on ia64 Message-ID: <41EF0E9F.4060909@wudika.de> Hi all, I just spent some time trying to build exim-src-rpms (taken from ftp.exim.org) on one of my ia64-systems. Sadly, sa-exim caused problems. Building sa-exim-4.1+cvs.so gcc -I../../src -I./eximinc -DDLOPEN_LOCAL_SCAN -DSPAMASSASSIN_CONF=\"/etc/exim/sa-exim.conf\" -DSPAMC_LOCATION=\"/usr/bin/spamc\" -O2 -Wall -shared -o sa-exim-4.1+cvs.so sa-exim.c sa-exim.c:512:2: warning: #warning you should not worry about the "might be clobbered by longjmp", see source /usr/bin/ld: /tmp/cc37rnoO.o: @gprel relocation against dynamic symbol version collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make: *** [sa-exim-4.1+cvs.so] Error 1 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.72130 (%build) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.72130 (%build) The rpm-changelog mentions "Updated to sa-exim+cvs (2004-08-23 version)", so the changes vor sa-exim 4.1 (2004/08/16) that mention "made hopefully 64 bit clean" and a mistake preventing sa-exim from building should not apply in this case. Since my ia64-hardware will never run sa-exim (just internal mail-routing, no connection to the "bad world outside"), this is acutally no problem for me, so I won't investigate it further. However, if you need more information of if I could try some patch I'll certainly try to help. From marc at merlins.org Wed Jan 19 19:38:46 2005 From: marc at merlins.org (Marc MERLIN) Date: Wed Jan 19 19:38:48 2005 Subject: [SA-exim] problems building sa-exim on ia64 In-Reply-To: <41EF0E9F.4060909@wudika.de> References: <41EF0E9F.4060909@wudika.de> Message-ID: <20050120033846.GA12936@merlins.org> On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 02:51:27AM +0100, Patrick von der Hagen wrote: > Hi all, > > I just spent some time trying to build exim-src-rpms (taken from > ftp.exim.org) on one of my ia64-systems. Sadly, sa-exim caused problems. > > Building sa-exim-4.1+cvs.so > gcc -I../../src -I./eximinc -DDLOPEN_LOCAL_SCAN > -DSPAMASSASSIN_CONF=\"/etc/exim/sa-exim.conf\" > -DSPAMC_LOCATION=\"/usr/bin/spamc\" -O2 -Wall -shared -o > sa-exim-4.1+cvs.so sa-exim.c > sa-exim.c:512:2: warning: #warning you should not worry about the "might > be clobbered by longjmp", see source > /usr/bin/ld: /tmp/cc37rnoO.o: @gprel relocation against dynamic symbol > version > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status Honestly, I have no idea why it says that, you'll need help from someone who knows more about gcc than I do. > The rpm-changelog mentions "Updated to sa-exim+cvs (2004-08-23 > version)", so the changes vor sa-exim 4.1 (2004/08/16) that mention > "made hopefully 64 bit clean" and a mistake preventing sa-exim from > building should not apply in this case. that patch wasn't to fix a build problem but a pointer problem in the code. It shouldn't have affected this. > Since my ia64-hardware will never run sa-exim (just internal > mail-routing, no connection to the "bad world outside"), this is > acutally no problem for me, so I won't investigate it further. However, > if you need more information of if I could try some patch I'll certainly > try to help. Can anyone offer a suggestion? Marc -- "A mouse is a device used to point at the xterm you want to type in" - A.S.R. Microsoft is to operating systems & security .... .... what McDonalds is to gourmet cooking Home page: http://marc.merlins.org/ | Finger marc_f@merlins.org for PGP key From simon at nuit.ca Wed Jan 19 23:13:13 2005 From: simon at nuit.ca (SR, ESC) Date: Wed Jan 19 20:13:30 2005 Subject: [SA-exim] problems building sa-exim on ia64 In-Reply-To: <20050120033846.GA12936@merlins.org> References: <41EF0E9F.4060909@wudika.de> <20050120033846.GA12936@merlins.org> Message-ID: <20050120041313.GA24453@smtp.nuit.ca> Le mer 2005-01-19 a 22:39:29 -0500, Marc MERLIN a dit: > On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 02:51:27AM +0100, Patrick von der Hagen wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I just spent some time trying to build exim-src-rpms (taken from > > ftp.exim.org) on one of my ia64-systems. Sadly, sa-exim caused problems. > > > > Building sa-exim-4.1+cvs.so > > gcc -I../../src -I./eximinc -DDLOPEN_LOCAL_SCAN > > -DSPAMASSASSIN_CONF=\"/etc/exim/sa-exim.conf\" > > -DSPAMC_LOCATION=\"/usr/bin/spamc\" -O2 -Wall -shared -o > > sa-exim-4.1+cvs.so sa-exim.c > > sa-exim.c:512:2: warning: #warning you should not worry about the "might > > be clobbered by longjmp", see source > > /usr/bin/ld: /tmp/cc37rnoO.o: @gprel relocation against dynamic symbol > > version > > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status > > Honestly, I have no idea why it says that, you'll need help from someone who > knows more about gcc than I do. i'm not any more clueful, but ld is the linker, it's called during the build to link up various lib deps. seems it got "mis-linked" somehow. what gcc version are you using? seems that ia64 needs gcc 4.0.x. that's what i see from my changelogs (apt-listchanges installed). also an up-to-date glibc is needed. i don't know redhat systems, so i couldn't help you with the s/w installed, but do check if you have a gcc-4.x ec/ -- Cold pizza and cold coffee, second best thing to cold pizza and warm beer. -- me -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 652 bytes Desc: Digital signature Url : http://lists.merlins.org/archives/sa-exim/attachments/20050119/5b70691d/attachment.bin From ssmeenk at freshdot.net Thu Jan 20 09:30:58 2005 From: ssmeenk at freshdot.net (Sander Smeenk) Date: Thu Jan 20 00:31:36 2005 Subject: [SA-exim] SA-Exim 4.2 released (official SA 3.x support) In-Reply-To: <20050117175107.GI20886@merlins.org> References: <20050117175107.GI20886@merlins.org> Message-ID: <20050120083058.GB2020@freshdot.net> Quoting Marc MERLIN (marc@merlins.org): > Deb package is here: > http://marc.merlins.org/linux/exim/files/debian/ > (compiled against unstable, you might have to rebuild for testing, or wait > for official deb packages from Sander Smeenk) I'll get on this asap! Regards, Sander -- | For tech support dial exactly the value of 22 divided by 7. | 1024D/08CEC94D - 34B3 3314 B146 E13C 70C8 9BDB D463 7E41 08CE C94D From jerry at cheesymouse.com Thu Jan 20 21:04:04 2005 From: jerry at cheesymouse.com (Jerry Rasmussen) Date: Thu Jan 20 17:59:52 2005 Subject: [SA-exim] SA-Exim 4.2 released (official SA 3.x support) Message-ID: <217D777D3789FC4591199BA41FB0617A0102D6@nemo.scriptthis.net> For what it is worth I have been running it for several days without issue. -----Original Message----- From: sa-exim-bounces+jerry=cheesymouse.com@lists.merlins.org [mailto:sa-exim-bounces+jerry=cheesymouse.com@lists.merlins.org] On Behalf Of Sander Smeenk Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2005 3:31 AM To: sa-exim@lists.merlins.org Subject: Re: [SA-exim] SA-Exim 4.2 released (official SA 3.x support) Quoting Marc MERLIN (marc@merlins.org): > Deb package is here: > http://marc.merlins.org/linux/exim/files/debian/ > (compiled against unstable, you might have to rebuild for testing, or > wait for official deb packages from Sander Smeenk) I'll get on this asap! Regards, Sander -- | For tech support dial exactly the value of 22 divided by 7. | 1024D/08CEC94D - 34B3 3314 B146 E13C 70C8 9BDB D463 7E41 08CE C94D _______________________________________________ SA-Exim mailing list SA-Exim@lists.merlins.org http://lists.merlins.org/lists/listinfo/sa-exim From ssmeenk+exim-sa at freshdot.net Tue Jan 25 20:11:14 2005 From: ssmeenk+exim-sa at freshdot.net (Sander Smeenk) Date: Tue Jan 25 11:12:45 2005 Subject: [SA-exim] [FWD] sa-exim_4.2-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED Message-ID: <20050125191114.GC30692@freshdot.net> Yay :) Accepted: sa-exim_4.2-1.diff.gz to pool/main/s/sa-exim/sa-exim_4.2-1.diff.gz sa-exim_4.2-1.dsc to pool/main/s/sa-exim/sa-exim_4.2-1.dsc sa-exim_4.2-1_i386.deb to pool/main/s/sa-exim/sa-exim_4.2-1_i386.deb sa-exim_4.2.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/s/sa-exim/sa-exim_4.2.orig.tar.gz Closing bugs: 266714 266791 267230 273000 282097 -- | Don't worry about what people think, they don't do it very often. | 1024D/08CEC94D - 34B3 3314 B146 E13C 70C8 9BDB D463 7E41 08CE C94D -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature Url : http://lists.merlins.org/archives/sa-exim/attachments/20050125/af585640/attachment-0001.bin