[SA-exim] Double sa-exim check?

[Riccardo Raffaelli]

Hi to all.
I'm new in sa-exim intergration, and I googled to find a response to my
question without success.

Let me explain:

I have an exim4 server with sa-exim configured that is checking well emails,
but in some case i look in the log this:

2007-10-09 13:00:34 no IP address found for host
137-96-177-194.serverdedicati.yyy.xxx (during SMTP connection from
[194.177.yyy.xxx])
2007-10-09 13:00:36 1IfEhO-0008Fb-Ql SA: Action: scanned but message isn't
spam: score=-2.6 required=5.0 (scanned in 2/2 secs | Message-Id:
!_!AAAAAAAAAAAYAAAAAAAAAE2ruGaQ4cJKsoWp4t1zhHnCgAAAEAAAALpi6O5k3UFPv2xPYJM3h
7kBAAAAAA==@adaconsulting.xxx). From <rraffaelli at adaconsulting.xxx>
(host=NULL [194.177.96.137]) for gorlando at yyy.xxx
2007-10-09 13:00:36 1IfEhO-0008Fb-Ql <= rraffaelli at adaconsulting.xxx
H=(vps.adaconsulting.xxx) [194.177.96.xxx] P=esmtp S=2810
id=!&!AAAAAAAAAAAYAAAAAAAAAE2ruGaQ4cJKsoWp4t1zhHnCgAAAEAAAALpi6O5k3UFPv2xPYJ
M3h7kBAAAAAA==@adaconsulting.xxx
2007-10-09 13:00:38 1IfEhR-0008Fp-7m SA: Action: scanned but message isn't
spam: score=-2.6 required=5.0 (scanned in 1/1 secs | Message-Id:
!_!AAAAAAAAAAAYAAAAAAAAAE2ruGaQ4cJKsoWp4t1zhHnCgAAAEAAAALpi6O5k3UFPv2xPYJM3h
7kBAAAAAA==@adaconsulting.xxx). From <rraffaelli at adaconsulting.xxx>
(host=localhost [127.0.0.1]) for gorlando at yyy.xxx
2007-10-09 13:00:38 1IfEhR-0008Fp-7m <= rraffaelli at adaconsulting.xxx
H=localhost [127.0.0.1] P=esmtp S=3307
id=!&!AAAAAAAAAAAYAAAAAAAAAE2ruGaQ4cJKsoWp4t1zhHnCgAAAEAAAALpi6O5k3UFPv2xPYJ
M3h7kBAAAAAA==@adaconsulting.xxx
2007-10-09 13:00:38 1IfEhO-0008Fb-Ql => gorlando at yyy.xxx R=amavis_router
T=amavis_smtp H=localhost [127.0.0.1]
2007-10-09 13:00:38 1IfEhO-0008Fb-Ql Completed
2007-10-09 13:00:39 1IfEhR-0008Fp-7m => gorlando at yyy.xxx R=hubbed_hosts
T=remote_smtp H=10.4.2.9 [10.0.0.1]
2007-10-09 13:00:39 1IfEhR-0008Fp-7m Completed

It's normal that I get 2 time the " SA: Action: scanned but message isn't
spam" message?

On the second connection (the one from itself) the server shouldn't pass
without scan the same email?


Riccardo.