<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1">
<title></title>
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff">
No, I didn't use it previously. (Hence, I have some experience with
sa-exim, but not using the patch.)<br>
<br>
As I indicated, however, for this Linux system, I *did* patch exim, and
am having the problem I described. The patch appeared to work
correctly. I used<br>
<br>
patch -p1 < whatever-the-patchfilename-was<br>
<br>
and saw a bunch of messages that various hunks had been patched
successfully...none indicating errors. exim subsequently compiled
without errors.<br>
<br>
<br>
Marc MERLIN wrote:<br>
<blockquote type="cite" cite="mid20040122213507.GA9492@merlins.org">
<pre wrap="">On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 04:33:22PM -0500, J. S. Greenfield wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">I've previously used sa-exim statically built into exim on a Solaris
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
so you don't use local_scan_path then
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap=""> main option "local_scan_path" unknown
Anybody know what I'm doing wrong?
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
yep, local_scan_path is only if you patched exim with the dynamically
loadable local scan patch.
You don't need that
Marc
</pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>