[SA-exim] SpamAssassin 2.50 & SA-Exim 2.2 ==> problem ...

Lawrence Walton lawrence at the-penguin.otak.com
Fri Feb 28 22:52:10 2003


W. E. Brooks [brooksw@webknowledge.com] wrote:
> I was able to move from SpamAssassin 2.43 to SpamAssassin 2.50 on a
> system running Exim 4.12 and SA-Exim 2.2 without any problems. I did not
> change the "report_safe" option from it's default value.
> 
> I also saw the note in the README for SpamAssassin 2.50 regarding the
> change in "default tagging behavior". It caused me some concern.
> However, I have not noticed any problems after upgrading to SpamAssassin
> 2.50.
> 
> -- 
> W. E. Brooks <brooksw@webknowledge.com>
> 
I had some strange messeges, after the upgrade
SMTP protocol violation: synchronization error (next input sent too soon): rejected "HELO jwnqxho" H=[200.68.155.53]
I restarted with this "report_safe 0" and everything seems to work very well.
I'm _VERY_ interested to see if Bayesian spam analysis, works.

-- 
*--* Mail: lawrence@otak.com
*--* Voice: 425.739.4247
*--* Fax: 425.827.9577
*--* HTTP://the-penguin.otak.com/~lawrence/
--------------------------------------
- - - - - - O t a k  i n c . - - - - - 





More information about the SA-Exim mailing list