[SA-exim] spamc/spamasssassin deb dependencies

[Sander Smeenk]

Quoting Kilian Krause (kk at verfaction.de):

Kilian? From GnomeMeeting? :)

> > This is a bug, IMHO, so thanks for pointing it out.
> actually that's a good default imho.

Yes and no. I agree that this is a flexible way of running multiple
sa-exim's with only one spamassassin, but I fear that this will not be
the only question about this issue.

I could as well add a message in some readme.txt, but nobody really
reads those before asking questions.

> Btw. anyone has seen dspam in Debian yet?

I was asked to package it. But i won't ;)   (ETIME)

Regards,
Sander.

-- 
| If I melted dry ice, can I swim without getting wet?
| 1024D/08CEC94D - 34B3 3314 B146 E13C 70C8  9BDB D463 7E41 08CE C94D
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.merlins.org/archives/sa-exim/attachments/20040609/e969cd33/attachment.bin