[SA-exim] SA-exim issue or SA issue?

[Sander Smeenk]

Quoting Jason Lixfeld (jason-saexim at lixfeld.ca):

> Secondly, I think this is more about clarification for me:  I see  
> some cases where the X-First-Run-Spamscore and the score in the X- 
> Spam-Status are different.

Besides what Jonathan Armitage wrote, the 'X-First-Run-Spamscore'-header
is not a header i have ever seen in the years i'm running sa-exim. Are
you sure you are using sa-exim, and not the exiscan patch? (of which i
have absolutely no knowledge)

Regards,
Sander.
-- 
| "Weird. It doesn't need a license if you change 5 bytes at 0x8cec94 to 0x90!"
|  -- Someone on IRC about licensed software
| 1024D/08CEC94D - 34B3 3314 B146 E13C 70C8  9BDB D463 7E41 08CE C94D